Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • jobol
    Participant
    Post count: 5
    in reply to: Specification #1515

    Is there a plan for SIGNED divisions? The ainsi C specs for division of SIGNED are good but it exist an other kind of SIGNED division. When computing A/B and A%B, C say something like:

    [1+abs(A/B)] * abs(B) > abs(A) >= abs(A/B) * abs(B)

    But the euclidian division specify that

    abs(B) > A%B >= 0

    Then for C: -10/3=-3 and -10%3=-1
    But for euclidian: -10/3=-4 and -10%3=2

    If specification is “easy”, do you intend to have 2 signed divisions?

    note ** https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_division#Examples

  • jobol
    Participant
    Post count: 5
    in reply to: Pipelining #1385

    The PIPELINE presentation is really interesting but the question of the epilog is not treated at all.

  • jobol
    Participant
    Post count: 5

    Great!

    The compromise is good, good enough for me…

    Thanks for the link

  • jobol
    Participant
    Post count: 5
    in reply to: Pipelining #1389

    Your reply let me thinking that it not so obvious. Further description (in white paper?) will interest me at the time of its deliver.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)