Larry's PseudoCode for Emulating Division

LarryP's division pseudoCode, attempting to follow the Wikipedia Newton-Raphson algorithm:

Non Millcomputing folks, please don't make changes to my pseudocode, at least not yet. Instead please make a separate sibling file in the Wiki.

Some rough pseudocode follows. Note, I'm defaulting to the variable names used in the Wikipedia Newton-Raphson division algorithm, but lower-cased wherever possible.

Function (OK, really more of a macro for expansion)

'''divu(n,d) --> q, r'''

// For now, assume both n and d are 
// (a) unsigned, 
// (b) the same width and 
// (c) are less than 128 bits.

// Unless otherwise specified, all math operations are non-widening versions.
//suspect there are some overflow checks that NEED to be added.

if (isNaR(n) || isNar(d)) {return NaR, NaR} // Handle NaR inputs

if (isNone(n) || isNone(d)) {return None, None} // Handle NaR inputs

if (0 == d) {return NaR, NaR}   // Handle zero divisor

/* '''How do we determine what width the arguments are?'''
 *
 * The width matters, especially when either of the inputs 
 * is already at max width (128 bits!!) 
 *
 * For now, I'm assuming BOTH input args are a width were we can apply widen, 
 * and get a result that's 
 * the same number of elements as the input.  This is bogus, but is a starting point.
 */

lzd = countlz(d);

if (MAX_INT_BITS == width(d)|| MAX_INT_BITS == width(n)) GOTO another algorithm

d = widen(d);

n = widen(n);    // This assumes d and n are same width.  MUST FIX LATER!

d = (d << lzd + 1); // I'm essentially putting the binary point at the mid-width 

n = (n << lzd + 1); // of the widened input args. 


// I want to try following the Wikipedia N-R algorithm, 
// including the suggested scaling.
// S'''till looking for genAsm examples of width-aware code.'''

// Now have an implicit binary point at the midpoint of our width
// And D is in the interval [1 -- 2) (can be 1, can't be 2
// with respect to our implicit binary point

x = rdivu(d) * n;       // Initialize via rdiv*.  Assumes that rdivu is better than 

                        // approximating X0 as = (48/17) - (32/17)*d 

//********************************************************************

// X := X + X × (1 - D' × X), done without fused multiply-adds :-(

// we want NON-WIDENING multiplied here, I believe.

t1 = d * x;      

t2 = (1 << ('''half_our_width''')) - t1;  // How do we determine our width?

t3 = x * t2;

x = x + t3; 

// Repeat above 4 calcs a TDB (and width-dependent!) number of times
//*********************************************************************

q = n * x;

q = q >> 1;    // undo the "floating point style" scaling to be in the lower half word

q = narrow(q); // force result back to same width as starting args

return q; 

// OPTIONALLY calc and return remainder, BUT DON'T FORGET the scaling