Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • nachokb
    Participant
    Post count: 7
    in reply to: LLVM pointers #2781

    Funny: I thought C would be one of the offenders. After all, basic C syntax exposes pointer arithmetic without any checks (I imagine there *is* a lot of C code out there doing nasty stuff to pointers).

  • nachokb
    Participant
    Post count: 7

    Speaking of which, how does the Mill cope with changing the clock frequency? Having different components running asynchronously sounds like bad news for overclockers.

    Awesome work!

    — nachokb

    [EDIT: grammar]

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by  nachokb.
  • nachokb
    Participant
    Post count: 7
    in reply to: Rust #2196

    No worries. Thanks!

    P.S. Here’s hoping there’ll be some new talk soon…

  • nachokb
    Participant
    Post count: 7

    a supercollider-management op

    Well, now I can’t wait for a supercollider-managing Mill…

    There’s enough flexibility within the Mill architecture to permit a lot of tuning without having to depart incompatibly

    Cool! That was exactly what I hoped.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)