- mermericoModeratorNovember 2, 2015 at 7:24 pmPost count: 10
Way back in the hackaday interview, Ivan talked briefly about crowdfunding for the Mill (end of video 2). This has become a great way for startups to gain early traction, but is a bit problematic for a company trying to introduce a new class of processor to the market. There may not be a large market for a high performance hobbyist computing platform (I’m interested in a Mill for my phone/laptop/desktop, but I don’t need one to replace my raspberry pi). Even if there is a market, consumers may become frustrated by delays that are bound to occur in these projects (see the controversy following Adapteva’s delay in shipping the Parallella boards).
An alternative is equity crowdfunding, whereby Mill Computing would sell stakes in the company to individuals. It seems like the biggest legal hurdles have been recently removed and some equity crowdfunding websites have already popped up. Getting a technical community that is literally invested in Mill Computing could have benefits beyond raising capital. Investors would be more likely to contribute to open source efforts on the compiler and OS fronts, for instance.
Has the Mill team discussed this at all?
- Ivan GodardKeymasterNovember 2, 2015 at 7:41 pmPost count: 473
While the newly available Title III crowdfunding is attractive in general, there are a host of sub-categories, each with their own attractions and drawbacks, that must be decided among. In addition, the longer we are able to hold off the better the evenual deal will be. At this point we have decided to hold off any fundraising beyond the current Convertible Notes offering (sign up at http://millcomputing.com/investor-list/ if interested) until after we have numbers on the major benchmarks. Stay tuned 🙂
- PeterHParticipantNovember 7, 2015 at 12:46 pmPost count: 35
Is $1M/year going to be enough funding for the Mill?
- Ivan GodardKeymasterNovember 7, 2015 at 1:21 pmPost count: 473
$1M will definitely not be enough when we go seriously into the hardware. We still have $1M available on the convertible Notes that you can buy today. However, the Title II of the Jobs Act allows up to $5M, which will be enough for the FPGA. The next after that will be around $25M; heavy semi is not cheap 🙂
Right now we are focused more on the software side, to get the tool chain up enough that we can run major benchmarks. The design is public enough that someone expert in CPUs can see it works, but big money tends not to be CPU-expert. Benchmarks will be more persuasive 🙂
- This reply was modified 2 years, 2 months ago by Ivan Godard.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.